NHacker Next on Rails
  • top
  • new
  • best
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
login
GuidelinesFAQListsAPISecurityLegalApply to YCContact

Hacker News on Rails, powered by React on Rails Pro. Open the source on GitHub by ShakaCode.

Commit 06fc0df

Rendered at 12:07:19 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Rails + React on Rails RSC.

Deepfake of Washington County, Oregon, Candidate Goes Viral Nationwide (oregonjournalismproject.org)

31 points by aliasxneo 15h ago | 52 comments

peder 15h ago
This story is fake; the flag was in fact upside down: https://x.com/alx/status/2112383598934573506

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://lookaside.fbsbx...

cortesoft 14h ago
And you trust this source because?
peder 14h ago
It's from their own Facebook page, it's the Google Image Search results from their own page.
ofjcihen 14h ago
“Before they deleted them” aka no way to check if this is BS.
peder 14h ago
Nonsense, the google image search result clearly still has the linkage established. There's nothing fake about it.
peder 14h ago
And why wouldn't you question why they deleted the original lol
ofjcihen 14h ago
That’s not the question. The question is “were they even there” before the “screenshot”.

As an example, I can screenshot your comment and have AI edit it to have you say “I really enjoy misleading people on the internet for money”, post it, and then say “I took this screenshot before they deleted it.”

gruez 14h ago
As opposed to trusting "Oregon Journalism Project"?
rideontime 14h ago
OJP has published a retraction. https://www.oregonjournalismproject.org/editors-note-october...
CGMthrowaway 14h ago
I'm confused. So was the flag really upsidedown or rightside up?
gruez 14h ago
upside down. The retracted article was "debunking" the upside down picture, claiming it was fake.

https://archive.is/kRbug

CGMthrowaway 13h ago
So the debunkers using AI to make the upsidedown flag look like it was rightside up, were the actual deepfakers?
WithinReason 4h ago
yes
Sabinus 14h ago
>A Fai campaign supporter then provided a different video of the event to OJP that showed the flag right side up.

It would be interesting to know where the "corrected" deepfake originated.

gruez 13h ago
That also contradicts the original article, which claims the right side up photo was "Provided by Nafisa Fai".
gruez 14h ago
In that case, lmao at all the people who were downvoted to grey (or rather, the people who downvoted them into grey), despite being in the right.

screenshot for posterity: https://i.postimg.cc/vTCTyYZ1/Screenshot.png

aliasxneo 13h ago
It's comical because I posted this knowing that the publisher was blatantly lying. You could literally look at the image they posted for 5 seconds and spot what was wrong with it. I just wanted to see how many other people would notice. It's interesting the retraction come shortly after I posted it, though.

Also worth noting at the time of this comment the lovely fact-checking website Axios is also still blatantly lying. Absolutely crazy this is all getting swept under the rug.

rideontime 14h ago
It's not unreasonable to expect End Wokeness to be spreading more lies about Somalian immigrants, given his track record. But the truth here was obvious to anybody willing to simply look at the evidence.
rideontime 14h ago
As much as I hate to have to defend Jack Posobiec (aka EndWokeness), saving the "real" screenshot from this article and uploading it to OpenAI's verification tool[0] indicates that it, in fact, was AI-generated. I welcome any correction on this.

[0] https://openai.com/research/verify/

e: Okay, now I feel stupid for even bothering to do that. Look below her name and you'll see the leftovers of the old flag.

edit 2: Retracted. https://www.oregonjournalismproject.org/editors-note-october...

gruez 14h ago
Even more damning seems to be the video of the event and cached images from google, which does not have an openai watermark (yes, verified myself).

https://x.com/kgallella/status/2112332869461045733

https://x.com/Honest_Bender/status/2112301833708519659

Of course it doesn't conclusively prove that the flag was definitely right side up, but you'd really have to bend over backwards to explain why Oregon Journalism Project's "debunking" is watermarked but the counter-debunkings aren't.

peder 14h ago
lol I didn't see that at all, wow they soooo poorly photoshopped this and then had their all friends in the media like Axios push their lies
ofjcihen 14h ago
Unless I’m missing something all of the pictures in the article and on X that it links to return as being AI generated?
rideontime 14h ago
There's only two images in the article, the "real" (fake) image (which appears twice), and the screenshot of the tweet; the latter returns "No OpenAI signals detected" for me, unlike the other.
ofjcihen 14h ago
I’m including all of the images linked in both.

And now that you’ve said that I’ve retried the same image 5 times and gotten AI 3 times and Not AI twice.

Something tells me that tools is about as reliable as Pangram.

rideontime 14h ago
Then just try looking in the bottom left corner of the "real" image to see the leftovers of the upside-down flag. The SynthID watermark isn't even necessary here to spot the obviousness of the fake.
drivingmenuts 12h ago
Is this a Monty Python scene about sacking people?
jst1fthsdys 13h ago
Why was the upside down flag even going viral?

Oh wait, she is Somali and all the rabid racists right wing trolls latched on to it. Now I am supposed to be concerned about the fake edit. I'm not.

DFHippie 14h ago
I don't understand why the people manipulated with lies aren't offended at the liars. They are primed to believe the lies, but aren't they mad that someone sought to manipulate them?

This keeps happening because it works. But why does it work? Why isn't there blowback?

happytoexplain 14h ago
It's embarrassing. Instead, they tell themselves, "well, it could have just as easily been real."

This has always been the case.

However, the more interesting thing going on is that we have never had to reckon with this problem anywhere near as much as we do now, since the barrier to creating fakes has been reduced from "skilled, motivated software user" to "all five billion humans who can write".

Edit: I think this comment is neutral enough to stand even under the new information that this might have been a cries-wolf situation, but I am acknowledging the fact.

peder 14h ago
Are you going to update your comment now that a retraction was issued? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50173029
happytoexplain 13h ago
Do not address people in this way. You are contributing to the exact problem we're talking about (how easy it is for information to turn out to be wrong).

Simply provide the new information, rather than snarkily implying that the parent is some kind of asshole. Save that for the normal internet.

gruez 11h ago
>Do not address people in this way. You are contributing to the exact problem we're talking about (how easy it is for information to turn out to be wrong).

It's pretty obvious the OP is a thinly veiled attack at whoever believed the "lie", dressed up as a question. The only saving grace is that the wording was so ambiguous that regardless of whether it was the debunking or counter-debunking that was correct, the comment would still be applicable.

rideontime 14h ago
Now that the story has been retracted, and the "real" image proven to be an obvious fake, are you mad that someone sought to manipulate you?
jplusequalt 14h ago
Truth isn't important anymore.
gruez 14h ago
The ironic part is that the veracity of the debunking is being questioned, so depending on how this turns out, this could either be referring to "haha dumb right wingers falling for AI generated meme" or "haha dumb left wingers falling for AI generated debunking". Truly a rorschach test of a comment.

edit: the story was retracted so the "people manipulated with lies" are the people who believed oregon journalism project?

dabinat 14h ago
Because they want it to be true.
UltraSane 14h ago
I feel the same way. Anyone who lies to you is fundamentally insulting you.
georgemcbay 14h ago
Candidate shouldn't have lied here (which seems likely based on the available evidence) and should have just owned it. Flying an upside-down flag is a perfectly patriotic thing to do in 2026, IMO, speaking as a white male, many-generational American. America is very much in distress.

But it is also ridiculous that the people predisposed to the other side (and who only made a big deal out of the original clip in the first place because they are racist misogynists) will hold up this relatively insignificant lie as some sort of an outrage while pulling the lever for the likes of Trump who lies as easily as he breathes.

aliasxneo 13h ago
I honestly could care less about the lie. I'm more offended about the upside down flag because, like the other person replied, it's not in fact an appropriate use. But I guess that automatically enrolls me into the racist misogynist group of people to simply disagree on the proper use of an upside down flag.
jst1fthsdys 12h ago
It is a perfectly appropriate use if you want to symbolize the country is in distress.

Do you get so upset about the flag when it's used as napkins, plates, thongs, or toilet paper?

aliasxneo 12h ago
Yes, surprisingly my views are consistent.

"The U.S. Flag Code (4 U.S.C. § 8(a)) states that the flag 'should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.'"

Treating institutional or policy disagreements as equivalent to "extreme danger to life or property" is an insane stretch of the meaning of those words. But in the post-modern world every word means whatever the person thinks it means, so it's not surprising to see people able to reconcile that in their minds.

jst1fthsdys 12h ago
The flag code is a suggestion. Her choice of symbolism has no requirement to be grounded in that. So arguing about the wording is meaningless.
aliasxneo 12h ago
When did I say there was a "requirement." Yes, anyone can do anything, but you moved the goal post because that's not what we were talking about. I'm simply staying that I personally find it offensive because I think its a gross misuse of the flag and then quoted the code under which I base that judgement on. Placing the American flag upside down has a documented, historical reason for it, enshrined in the flag code. You can't just pretend that doesn't exist. You can choose to blatantly ignore that and flip it for some other reason, but that doesn't at all negate my argument.

I'm really curious to get your take on how that makes me a racist misogynist though.

ButlerianJihad 14h ago
> Flying an upside-down flag is a perfectly patriotic thing to do

It is a really dumb virtue-signaling protest thing. In fact, it has nothing to do with the actual "distress signal" that it is meant to be.

> America is very much in distress

But you don't invert the flag when your nation is in distress. You invert the flag when your vessel is in distress. Inverted flag is a 9-1-1 call to all who can see it. It indicates immediate and extreme danger to life, limb, or property.

Furthermore, it is not up to us dumb citizens to determine when our entire nation is in distress. Honestly, our nation is bigger than you or me, and she can fend for herself on her own merits, without us telling her how she should feel. If "all America is in distress" then who will come and save her, huh? We are sovereign and that means we take care of our own messes, and solve our own problems!

Let's leave the inverted flag for its true meaning, which is individual or vessel-wide distress. Anything else is just posturing and performative slacktivism.

jst1fthsdys 12h ago
Sorry you don't understand the concept of symbolism.

> Furthermore, it is not up to us dumb citizens to determine when our entire nation is in distress. Honestly, our nation is bigger than you or me, and she can fend for herself on her own merits, without us telling her how she should feel. If "all America is in distress" then who will come and save her, huh? We are sovereign and that means we take care of our own messes, and solve our own problems!

Nonsensical.

> Let's leave the inverted flag for its true meaning, which is individual or vessel-wide distress. Anything else is just posturing and performative slacktivism.

Running for office is slacktivism now? You gotta try harder to justify your fake outrage, this is just lazy.

ButlerianJihad 6h ago
Sorry, but I have been Roman Catholic for 54 years. I've deeply studied the liturgy, architecture, iconography and sacred art. I can assure you that I know "the concept of symbolism" pretty damn well by now.

My mom has a little American flag pin, and she's taken to wearing it inverted on purpose. At least one friend has tried to rotate it right-side up for her, and she had to explain what she's doing with it. I respectfully disagree. My father faithfully flew our flag on every prescribed day, very respectfully, and Dad, (unlike Mom) taught me a lot of respect for authority that was wasted on me in youth, but is beginning to make sense as I age and accumulate more wisdom.

So no, it's not "patriotic" to fly an inverted American flag. It's arrogant. It takes the idea that "our nation is in distress" and leaves it to the judgement of the individual who hoists the flag, rather than our leadership or someone in authority. That's not for us to judge. That's the arrogance.

It's foolish to abuse our national symbol like that. It's disrespectful. It's like calling 9-1-1 to order a pizza. It's not something that patriots do. Patriots fly the flag with respect, and according to the regulations. There are regulations for flying and displaying the American flag.

I've seen a guy at church with a big American flag shirt. It's got eagles and woo woo on it but it's substantially an image of a big American flag, but on his shirt. That's disrespectful. I am sure that he considers himself a patriot, and a conservative, but that is not how Americans should be displaying the flag, as a garment, as wrapping ourselves in something, and certainly not inverting it.

Now if the American flag is flown, inverted, outside an official's residence, such as one of the Supreme Court Justices, perhaps that should be taken with some gravitas. Unfortunately, that very Justice denied that he authorized that display, and apparently his wife did it without his input. So we are kinda back at the arrogance and judgementalism that individual citizens believe our nation is in distress, and therefore, they stretch symbolism to its breaking-point, in order to make a public statement. It's wrong.

I encourage you to try and dial 9-1-1 to order your next pizza, and see how the dispatcher treats you. And now imagine that some veteran comes home from deployment and sees your asinine "symbolism" in your front yard. Perhaps you might care to spit in her face, or give her a slap while you're at it?